Amendment No. 6 is part of the group. Therefore, I would particularly like to speak to this point. Amendment No. 6 extends the number of offices to which the confirmatory hearings apply. We will have fuller debates on health strategy later and on the role of the health adviser and his or her deputies. That is part of consideration of the Bill.
The amendment would include the health adviser and the deputy health adviser on the list of individuals whose confirmation is required by the Assembly. As will become clear from our forthcoming debates, the position of health adviser could potentially have great influence over the health service in London. Sweeping changes that impact on all Londoners could be made under the health inequalities strategy. In those circumstances, we do not believe that the health adviser should have an automatic appointment from within the Civil Service—and we propose another amendment to that effect later—nor do we believe that the appointment should be without scrutiny approval. Therefore, we propose Amendment No. 6.
Greater London Authority Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hanningfield
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 April 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Greater London Authority Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c29-30GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:15 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393209
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393209
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393209