I have a lot of sympathy with the proposed amendment. There is a danger that the Mayor will become tired. If he wins the next election, there is an even greater danger that we shall then face an election just before the Olympics and that he will automatically get a shoe in at that point. That seems to me an unfortunate combination of circumstances. On the other hand, applying this measure to the current Mayor would be entirely inappropriate, particularly as we are about a year ahead of the elections for the GLA. It is an interesting proposal. I am not worried about precedent because the previous GLA Act was all about setting new rules and stretching the envelope. As I say, it is an interesting idea but one that would be entirely inappropriately applied to the current Mayor.
Greater London Authority Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Valentine
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 April 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Greater London Authority Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c23GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:49:29 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393189
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393189
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393189