UK Parliament / Open data

Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill

The Attorney-General has advanced essentially the same point as the noble Lord, Lord Smith of Clifton; namely, that with regard to organised crime and non-paramilitary activities, the 2003 Act would be adequate. The problem, among other things, is that the 2003 Act sets very high standards for a non-jury trial. Although we are dealing with the same phenomenon, we have a higher standard if there is no paramilitary connection or background and a lower standard if there is a paramilitary connection or background. In addition there is the question of witnesses and/or the problem of perverse verdicts that apply to serious organised crime. I have listened to what the Attorney-General said. I want to reflect on that and consider whether I want to improve my drafting at a later stage. Consequently, at this stage, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 11 not moved.]

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

690 c120-1GC 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top