I find these amendments attractive, and I look forward with great interest to hearing what the noble and learned Lord the Attorney-General has to say about them.
I would like to speak briefly about Amendments Nos. 3, 4 and 9. Could the noble and learned Lord tell us whether, and if so in what other recent statutes, the word ““suspects”” appears in a similar context? One asks oneself what it means. I suppose it must mean, and the courts would hold that it means ““suspects on reasonable grounds”” or ““has reasonable grounds for suspecting””. The word is very loose and I wonder whether it has not been put in with a view to having something to give away in the course of the Bill’s proceedings—not an unknown stratagem, and a very sensible one.
Similarly, the word ““risk”” really is tempting providence. One can say that there is a risk if something can be foreseen as possible even though it is never near probable. What exactly do the Government have in mind? Has this been used previously in a similar context? That is very important.
Those are the points I wish to make at this stage. I am grateful that the amendments have been explained so lucidly and helpfully and look forward to hearing the response.
Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Mayhew of Twysden
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 March 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c113-4GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:50:30 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385886
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385886
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385886