We will reflect on what the Minister said, but I am disappointed that he begins with a drafting point, which is the last refuge of Ministers who cannot think of a substantive reply to an amendment. It is still a great pity that we cannot open the Bill with a declaration that in future jury trials will be the norm, and that the exceptions that are provided now in Clause 1 are indeed exceptions. It would have been beneficial to establish the intent of the Government—not just of the Government, but of all parties in Northern Ireland and in your Lordships’ House—that that should be the situation, and that it should be made plain in the Bill. As the noble and learned Lord says, we have no option but to accept his explanation for the time being. I will discuss this with my noble friend and we will see what further action we will take, if necessary, on Report. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 1 [Issue of certificate]:
Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Avebury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 March 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c101GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:48:25 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385873
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385873
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385873