UK Parliament / Open data

Greater London Authority Bill

Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 27 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bills on Greater London Authority Bill.
The hon. Gentleman is right. He will know that the London Assembly’s planning scrutiny committee, of which I was for a time the chair and Baroness Hamwee the deputy chair, produced a report criticising the Mayor’s behaviour on those very matters. Does he agree that although the Mayor has, in response to questions in the Assembly, rather belatedly conceded that he would hold planning meetings in public if he got the positive power to do so, it is not satisfactory for that to depend purely on the assurance of one individual, who might change after an election, and that it is crucial that a safeguard is written into the Bill to ensure that planning meetings are held in public? That should not be dependent on the Mayor’s personal concession. It should be in the primary legislation.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

457 c860 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top