It would be defined initially both by case law and by the code of practice, I suppose. I know that the Minister has resisted this, but I do not feel that this is something that can simply lie totally within the code of practice; there has to be something in the Bill. I wonder if the Minister could look at this amendment to see whether it could be made more acceptable. I do not say that every aspect of it is perfect. It would be extremely welcome and would avoid our bringing the matter back at the next stage if the Minister could undertake to have a second look.
Mental Health Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 January 2007.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Mental Health Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c757 Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:29:20 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370194
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370194
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370194