I shall comment on Amendment No. 131. The noble Lord, Lord Lee of Trafford, explained that the £500 penalty laid down is inadequate and that a reference to the OFT could result in a more serious restraint of some sort on the estate agent concerned. However, one effect of the noble Lord’s amendment would be to deprive trading standards officers of their powers to impose a penalty. Trading standards officers are local authority officials with expert local knowledge of their part of the country, and it would be a pity if their role was excluded. I do not support Amendment No. 131 in so far as it excludes trading standards officers. I should declare an interest as a former president of the Trading Standards Institute and a current vice-president.
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Borrie
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c103GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:47:27 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368570
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368570
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368570