Before my noble friend gives a final proper response—at least, I assume it will be—may I say briefly that I am grateful for the Minister’s comments and will reflect on them, although I continue to feel that there are some problems here? He is right that there is more than one ombudsman in the telecommunications sector, but I believe that he acknowledged that the DTI had also had a hand in that proposal, albeit with the DCMS alongside it. I should put on the record that I was aware of that, as are others. It would be putting it mildly to say that there are mixed views on the merits of that for consumers. I shall not add to that at this stage.
The other point that I want to put firmly on record is that there is the most glaring disparity between what is envisaged here and what the Government have done in relation to financial services. I therefore hope that the Minister will reflect on what I have said, and on what the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, has said, too.
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Newton of Braintree
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c80GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:50:37 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_367569
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_367569
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_367569