I would love to ask a question. The noble Lord’s arguments are well thought out and he knows the subject fantastically well; but I am worried about the flexibility and correctness of what Energywatch has been doing. The noble Lord rightly said that it has been very good and in the previous Sitting of the Grand Committee we were given a good example of its flexibility. But if the National Consumer Council is a fairly moribund, inflexible and reactive, rather than proactive, organisation, how does the noble Lord think that the people who currently work in Energywatch or the new consumer council for water—with whom I am very impressed and are light on their feet—will feel about being subsumed into a moribund, reactive organisation? If I worked for Energywatch, I would not be happy about that at all and I might wish to pack my bags and go away. There is a chance that some of the best people in those organisations who have been running their own operation brilliantly would say, ““Oh well, forget this—I am not going to join this organisation””.
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness O'Cathain
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 January 2007.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c42-3GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:44:31 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_367530
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_367530
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_367530