On a very small point, the description ““designated consumer”” often comes up in the Bill. We all basically understand what it means, but it is probably unnecessarily exclusive. I would prefer ““priority consumer””, because that is what is meant by ““designated consumer””. Other consumers should not be left out of this provision altogether. There should be a further description in these clauses, so that it could be a priority to deal with priority consumers, but not excluding all other consumers.
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 December 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c160GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 12:48:26 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366574
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366574
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366574