I endorse that comment. The Minister said that it was the belief of her department that the CRU offered best value for money in delivering the services that it does, but it did not seem from what she said that that belief was based on any hard evidence, because her department simply had not tested any alternatives. She said that there were no plans to put the work out to tender, but if the rules which were published in 1997 by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster still apply, I am not quite sure why that decision was taken. I would be grateful if the Minister came back to me and the noble Baroness on that issue.
Personal Injuries (NHS Charges) (Amounts) Regulations 2006
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 December 2006.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Personal Injuries (NHS Charges) (Amounts) Regulations 2006.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c35GC Session
2006-07Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-14 23:08:21 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_363017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_363017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_363017