My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for explaining his amendments. We are very pleased to support them, and to support Amendments Nos. 15 and 25 in particular, which put a duty on the national authority to consult. The Minister asked when any regulation had been rejected. I believe that the House voted against one on supplementary medicine. It went to another place and our vote was overturned straight away. I accept what the Minister said about any future discussions on the powers of this House, but it would make an enormous difference if we could have a greater say in this.
The Minister says that any judgment would be based on scientific evidence. I am happy to have that on the record. I do not doubt it for a minute. My amendment was not trying to suggest that it should be considered only for that reason. That was not its intention. This shows how carefully one must choose the right words to ensure that one’s amendments fit what one is trying to do. I thank the Minister for his response, and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 13 [Licensing or registration of activities involving animals]:
Animal Welfare Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Byford
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 October 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Animal Welfare Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
685 c1042-3 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:09:49 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353981
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353981
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353981