I shall give more than a response—I hope I shall give the House a very satisfactory response. It is clear from motion 5 that the position has been set out. The Opposition have had June, July, August, September and now October to consider it. I note that neither my right hon. Friend the Leader of the House nor I received any intimation that this was an unsatisfactory way of proceeding on the matter. Perhaps the Opposition spent rather too long earlier not listening to the previous debate but formulating a way of raising the matter on the Floor of the House.
Let me explain in clear terms. In the 19 years that I have been in the House, I have heard some spurious points of order. I congratulate the hon. Member for Eddisbury (Mr. O'Brien) on the creative way in which he raised the point of order. He has done very well. Far be it from me to criticise the Speaker—
Strategic Health Authorities (Establishment and Abolition) (England) Order
Proceeding contribution from
Nigel Griffiths
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 17 October 2006.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Strategic Health Authorities (Establishment and Abolition) (England) Order 2006.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
450 c844-5 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:53:17 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352846
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352846
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352846