UK Parliament / Open data

UK-US Extradition Treaty

I will deal with that, Mr. Deputy Speaker, when, if I am fortunate enough to catch your eye, I have the opportunity to contribute to the debate. Why has the Solicitor-General used the wholly prejudicial description ““the Enron three”” in relation to those British subjects, when the company that they are accused of defrauding, NatWest, is British, and when the British authorities have decided to take no action in respect of acts committed in this country? Why has he engaged in that entirely prejudicial description of those British subjects?

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

448 c1404 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Legislation

Extradition Act 2003
Back to top