Let us hope they have the relevant advice and the good sense to do that where it is right to do so. We are on the same side, but for some people, it is much better if the thing is disposed of properly. All of us want the proper protections to be in place so that the right result is achievable even if it is not always achieved in the justice system.
So far, I have looked at all the procedures from the point of view of the defendant, who may or may not be guilty. But one’s overall concern is still with the victim, as the noble Baroness says—the victim and the public. There is accountability to the victim and the public which sometimes only a court appearance can bring. We must get the right balance and make sure that we do not avoid public accountability through a court appearance where that is the right thing to do.
I welcome the opportunity to look at these matters during the summer. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment No. 191C, as an amendment to Amendment No. 191B, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 191D to 191J, as amendments to Amendment No. 191B, not moved.]
On Question, Amendment No 191B agreed to.
Police and Justice Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 July 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Police and Justice Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c688 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-16 21:01:42 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336683
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336683
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336683