I am saddened but not entirely surprised to hear that the hon. Lady has problems with the phrase ““legal presumption””. Will she explain why 50 of her colleagues have signed early-day motion 128, which refers specifically to the need to have a ““legal presumption of contact””? Are they misguided, or not on message? Will they surprise her with how they vote if the new clause is pressed to a Division?
Children and Adoption Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Tim Loughton
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c1228Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 00:48:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331345
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331345
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331345