We shall come back to this on Report. It might be possible to prosecute both. If that is not possible, there is flexibility in the Bill to prosecute the one but put the costs of the destruction on the other.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
[Amendment No. 101 not moved.]
Animal Welfare Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rooker
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Animal Welfare Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c36GCSession
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:13:11 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329387
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329387
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329387