The amendment in the names of the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, and the noble Duke, the Duke of Montrose, is grouped with Amendment No. 159 in my name and that of the noble Baroness, Lady Miller of Chilthorne Domer.
The noble Baroness, Lady Byford, has made a very strong case. We are always aware of the Government’s serious concern about infection, cross-infection and the spread of disease, which is clearly demonstrated by the action that was taken in relation to foot and mouth disease and bird flu in this country. That is all commendable. That is why there is a great need to be very serious about taking the most stringent measures possible to ensure that disease is not spread. Amendment No. 159 is designed to meet this purpose. As the inspectors will not necessarily be expert in animal health, it is important to ensure that they are aware of the serious health concerns associated with contact with animals, especially when contact may be frequent, wide-ranging and often involve badly kept animals.
It would be all too easy for an unsuspecting inspector to carry some infection or parasites from one home to another. This could cause animal-to-human problems. The amendments identify this problem, and I hope that the Government will take a serious view of what we have suggested.
Animal Welfare Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dholakia
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 June 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Animal Welfare Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c29GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:50:47 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329374
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329374
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329374