Perhaps I can help the hon. Gentleman in his difficulties with the right hon. and learned Member for Rushcliffe (Mr. Clarke). I am sure he would accept that all motions before the House tabled by Back Benchers must have equal status. According to his logic, the House would be forced to debate any early-day motion that attracted more than 65 signatures. That would tie down parliamentary time to an impossible degree.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Andrew Miller
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c896-7 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:39:04 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324092
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324092
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324092