The clause includes the word ““or””. The amendment seeks to replace that with ““and””. With the ““or”” still in place we can remove any burden but we do not have to remove overall burdens. The overall burden can increase. As I have said, there is an ““or””. The Minister can say that he is removing a burden even though there is an increase in overall burdens. There is still compliance as things stand.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Smith
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c782 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:11:55 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323668
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323668
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323668