I would go slightly further than my noble friend. I think that not only did no Member of this Committee, apart from the Minister, mention the possibility of age 21, I do not think that that issue was ever raised in the other place when this clause was accepted with cross-party support. I stand to be corrected on that, as I need to read Hansard. It has certainly never been mentioned to me up to this point.
I am grateful to the Minister for what he has undertaken to do. He will realise that, as Members of the Committee have said, this issue has a number of serious dimensions to it which bear close scrutiny. We cannot proceed any further with it now, but without question we will have to return to this matter at a later stage. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
On Question, Whether Clause 13 shall stand part of the Bill?
Health Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 May 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c28GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:43:22 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321430
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321430
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321430