Lords amendment No. 33 reaches the heart of the Meyrick judgment on what natural beauty is by defining it in a way that I—and the whole House, I am sure—am more than happy with. Perhaps the Minister will explain why that is not sufficient, and why Lords amendment No. 17 is necessary on top of it.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
Proceeding contribution from
James Paice
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 29 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill 2005-06.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
444 c952Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:03:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313516
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313516
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_313516