I respond to my noble friend by explaining my point. I was not saying that we should rely on public opinion. My point was that there are occasions on which we depart from public opinion. We should not be driven by it. However, if we are to depart from it, we must have a very clear reason for doing so to explain why that is the case. My point was that I have heard no compelling reason to move away from the current position. Yes, a balance must be drawn but, on my noble friend’s last point, I return to my earlier point: there is a difference between becoming a company director, where an individual is chosen by the company for the particular skills that that person has that sets them apart from others; and giving everyone in that age group a right that they can exercise. There is a clear distinction between the two. If we are to move away from public opinion, there must be a compelling case and I have not heard it.
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Norton of Louth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c128GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:30:10 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310989
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310989
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310989