If I can go backwards through the amendments, on Amendment No. 84, the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, was very perceptive. She noticed that when I turned to that page of the amendments I started to talk to the wrong amendment but very rapidly started talking to the right amendment. She will get a tick for that on her performance assessment; no doubt we will all have those in due course.
I am grateful for what the Minister said, but I would have liked it to have been stronger. If in a registration authority both the registration officer and the local authority feel strongly that they are not capable of conducting a pilot, and if perhaps two or three London boroughs thought that they could not cope with it, it would be wrong to impose it. Let us take a hypothetical situation where a highly competent authority such as Kensington and Chelsea might say that it could not handle a pilot because it was dealing with HMO problems, getting the register in order, and the millions of languages that the noble Baroness was talking about last week. I notice, for the benefit of the tape, as they say, that the Minister is agreeing with me—
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Greaves
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c81GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:55:28 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310891
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310891
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310891