My Lords, I hear it remarked that there is nothing wrong with party politics. I entirely agree. I made that assertion because the Leader of the Official Opposition, Lord Strathclyde, gave the game away last Wednesday. He said:"““I am entirely satisfied that there are no Salisbury convention implications if the House were to return this small point back to another place””.—[Official Report, 15/3/06; col. 1245.]"
Thus it is on a small point that the Opposition are developing their notion of standing up for what is right. It is on this ““small point”” that the Opposition wish us to return the Bill to the Commons for a fourth time. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with pursuing party-political advantage or objectives. Yet when a party-political objective is pursued in such a manner over a ““small point””, it becomes disreputable.
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Eatwell
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c33 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:38:17 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310193
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310193
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_310193