I accept the noble Baroness’s point. However, there is an underlying difference of philosophy between us, as she rightly inferred. That will be apparent in some of the points that I shall come to. One philosophy states that someone should be listed in the register unless there are very compelling reasons why that should not be the case. However, I lean towards a very different philosophy and take a very different view. As I say, that may come up in later amendments. My view stems from a very different philosophy but I shall be happy to discuss it later. I completely take the noble Baroness’s point about secondary legislation—I am not looking for a specific response or anything in the Bill—in this regard.
Electoral Administration Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Norton of Louth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 16 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Electoral Administration Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c565-6GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:44:12 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309524
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309524
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309524