With the greatest respect to the Home Secretary, his reaction to our sincere and, as it happens, rather open attempts to reach agreement, as revealed by the amendment, will discourage us the next time that we wish to achieve cross-party agreement on such matters. My recollection is that the UN’s use of the word ““glorification”” was heavily qualified by legal understandings of intention and purposeful activity in the act of glorifying—understandings that have been excluded from this Bill. So the read-across to the UN understanding of ““glorification”” is not entirely valid.
Terrorism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Nick Clegg
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1675 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-24 16:03:15 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309360
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309360
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_309360