UK Parliament / Open data

Terrorism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Dominic Grieve (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 16 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Bill.
There is no doubt that in many respects the Bill is a belt and braces job. As we pointed out to the Government, the truth is that there are perfectly good laws on the statute book that could be used instead of clause 1 or many other clauses. I must admit that I will probably not lose a huge amount of sleep over that, provided that the legislation that we enact is rational, fair, makes sense and, if I may say to the Home Secretary, does not provide a lawyer’s field day of casuistic arguments whereby every person who is prosecuted under the glorification clause will take the courts up hill and down dale day after day, and eventually be acquitted, probably on the direction of a judge, because it is all completely unintelligible.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

443 c1668-9 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top