Trying to extract from the Government’s words any coherent intellectual basis for the case that they are now making is extremely difficult. The Government have changed their reasons for supporting not only identity cards, but the national identity register, and they change their position on what they mean by ““voluntary”” and what they think that they mean by ““compulsory”” day by day.
As the Home Secretary undoubtedly had reported to him, because he is neither deaf nor stupid, the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Nationality said in Committee that the Government accept that their arguments in support of identity cards and the national identity register as a bulwark against terrorism are flawed. He also said that they accept that their arguments in support of identity cards and the national identity scheme as a bulwark against general crime, immigration breaches and other matters are all flawed. As each defence has been removed from them, they have returned to the argument that they will find ID cards ““more convenient””.
Identity Cards Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Garnier
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 13 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Identity Cards Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c1252 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-16 20:34:42 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307335
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307335
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307335