I am grateful to the Minister for nodding, but he knows that I must put that point on the record in Hansard. I am aware that he swears that the legislation will not be used to implement the directive, and I believe him, but future Ministers will not necessarily share his scruples in similar situations, and the amendment would make it doubly certain that the porthole is locked and bolted.
As I said to my hon. Friend the Member for Kettering (Mr. Hollobone), we are not against criminalising intentional discharge. Appius Claudius, to whom I referred earlier, was condemned to death for impiety. However, accidental discharge does not demand punishment or prohibition unless it is the result of deliberate recklessness, which is especially true of punishment or prohibition conducted by one part of the world without reference to the other maritime states. I commend the amendment to the House.
Merchant Shipping (Pollution) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Julian Brazier
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Merchant Shipping (Pollution) Bill (HL).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c741-2 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-26 16:30:51 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305439
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305439
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_305439