My Lords, I am sorry if I have not clarified it; I thought that I had. As I said, we believe that it is very important to provide a power that allows the Secretary of State to bring a further date forward in due course. It is not a cancellation; it is a postponement and that would be made clear. We also believed that it was important to remove the 10-year time frame because it would give us an opportunity to open the field for Sir Michael Lyons to be as free and radical as he wishes. At the same time, we have taken the opportunity to say that there is no point in waiting for Sir Michael Lyons, but that it is important to provide this power so that we do not have to come back to the House with primary legislation. I should think that that would commend itself to the noble Lord for all sorts of reasons. I am sure we will be able to debate some of the other issues he raised in debates on other amendments.
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Andrews
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c263 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:55:43 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304232
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304232
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304232