My Lords, I will be extremely brief because I suspect that all the points that could have been made have already been made. Is it not plain that the examples given by the noble Lord, Lord Tebbit, are obviously capable of amounting to glorification? More to the point, is it not obvious that a jury would be entitled so to conclude? The word ““glorify””, or ““glorification””, is a simple English word that would be well understood by an English jury.
Terrorism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Grabiner
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c155 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-24 16:03:00 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303510
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303510
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303510