My Lords, I shall make a totally different and very small point. I was very concerned by what the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, said about the difficulty of things not being precise enough to make it possible for the Crown Prosecution Service to recommend that a case should be brought. I have in mind what happened in Oxford on Sunday, when a young man of 16 and some students did what no one has really done so far; they condemned and resisted those people who have been terrorising Huntingdon Life Sciences and trying to prevent the university having a very necessary and valuable scientific laboratory in which animals are used.
It seems to me that it would be disastrous if glorification was so vague that those people could not be caught. I want to be reassured, as I am by my noble friend Lord Kingsland’s Amendment No. 34C, that the provision is spelt out so carefully that there can be no possible reason why those people, if they are caught and identified, cannot be prosecuted.
Terrorism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Park of Monmouth
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c150-1 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-24 16:02:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303506
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303506
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303506