My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt the noble Baroness and thank her for allowing me to intervene. I agree with the noble Lord that the opportunity to revise is important. Does the noble Baroness agree that we are in a muddle over this fundamental disagreement because of the highly unsatisfactory definition of terrorism in the 2000 Act? We need to wait for the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, to bring forward a more satisfactory definition of terrorism. I believe that with a more satisfactory definition we can achieve a consensus.
Terrorism Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Bishop of Oxford
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 28 February 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
679 c140Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-24 16:03:05 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303490
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303490
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_303490