I entirely agree with my hon. Friend’s comments. His point about terrorist or freedom fighter is exactly the issue that the UN is addressing, and it is why some of our hon. Friends pressed the need for a new look at the definition of terrorism in the debates on the legislation last year. It is a difficult problem, because the question for freedom fighters is how their fight for freedom is undertaken and who is brought into the firing line. I accept my hon. Friend’s point and it needs to be part of the process.
On my hon. Friend’s first point, he is a far more experienced parliamentarian than I, but I regret to say that it is not simply a question of what has happened in the other place. In this House, we have seen some sharp exchanges in some debates. I never make political comments about the Lib Dems or the Conservatives—I eschew that pleasure—but I hear what my hon. Friend says and there is much substance to it. All parties would do themselves credit in front of the public if they took the issues seriously, addressed them directly and could not be accused of political point scoring.
Prevention of Terrorism Act
Proceeding contribution from
Charles Clarke
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 2 February 2006.
It occurred during Ministerial statement on Prevention of Terrorism Act.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
442 c488 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:46:36 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297426
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297426
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_297426