I urge the noble Baroness to consider that she may be over-prescriptive—almost ideological— on this point, if I dare say so. Surely we want flexibility. The great thing about ““provide”” is that it does not exclude commissioning, whereas ““commissioning”” would exclude Natural England doing something itself if it felt it were the obvious thing to do. I do not think we want to say that it must be one thing or the other. We want what is best for the particular situation. Some training may be in-house; a lot may be commissioned. I think ““provide”” is a more inclusive term than ““commission””.
Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Judd
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2006.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c282 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:01:06 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296929
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296929
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_296929