Indeed, my hon. Friend is correct. He, of course, is one of the experts to whom I referred earlier, and I look forward to his contribution, although it will necessarily be brief because of the overly restrictive programme motion.
New clause 1, which stands in the name of several of my hon. Friends—all of whom are here present, I am happy to note—says:"““Notwithstanding powers conferred on the Legal Services Commission by section 1, the Court shall retain the power to grant a representation order upon oral application””."
Those are momentous matters, yet we now know, having arrived here on this day in these circumstances—the shape taken by today’s business, such as business questions and the important statement, which rightly was allowed to run for some time a short while ago—that we have been left with this insultingly brief period in which to consider them.
Criminal Defence Service Bill [Lords] (Programme) (No. 2)
Proceeding contribution from
Eric Forth
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 26 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Criminal Defence Service Bill (HL).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
441 c1554 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-16 20:37:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294790
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294790
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_294790