That sort of issue provides a perfect case for having a London committee. That point could not be more relevant. However, I will not get drawn into that; I shall discuss that matter with my hon. Friend on another day and another occasion.
I shall read another part of the Mayor’s briefing, although it is a bit jargony. I want to read it into the record, because I think that the point is made. The Mayor’s staff say:"““A Greater London Committee would enhance the work of the CEHR by helping to ensure . . . a regional focus on London appropriate to London’s size, demography, complexity and diversity, and experience in developing and delivering equality policies . . . appropriate engagement with London’s unique governance arrangements . . . synergy between regional strategies and national strategy and policy””"
and"““tailored stakeholder engagement and dialogue, which will aid clear and transparent channels of communication.””"
That is a bit jargony, but when hon. Members read it in Hansard, they will see the point.
Equality Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Harry Cohen
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 16 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Equality Bill (HL).
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
441 c629 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 21:30:32 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291109
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291109
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291109