UK Parliament / Open data

Equality Bill [Lords]

Proceeding contribution from Gerald Kaufman (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 16 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bills on Equality Bill (HL).
I am not questioning in any way the good faith of my hon. Friend or the Government. It is a fact of parliamentary life, however, that whatever the Government’s conclusions, and even if the Green Paper that they promise to introduce includes precisely what is wanted, the constrictions of the legislative timetable mean that it is not possible to know when or, indeed, if legislation can be introduced in this Parliament to enact what my hon. Friend has promised in good faith. By contrast, the new clause gives the Government time and scope to deal with the issue, given its inclusion of the word ““may””, which I have cited twice. Acceptance would therefore not bind the Government or lead them into a cul-de-sac. Perhaps you could advise me, Mr. Speaker, on a procedural, not a policy, matter. If the Bill is amended today, I understand that it must return to the House of Lords because it is a Lords Bill. If that is so, I am sure that hon. Members on both sides of the House will be satisfied by an assurance that the Government will reconsider the matter before the Bill’s return to the House of Lords. I hope that my hon. Friend the Minister responds positively, because nobody wants division in the House on this issue.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

441 c580 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top