Does that mean that we have to rely on the Government finding a solution to Clause 1? There is not a fall-back position for the Government if they do not. Is the Minister guaranteeing that there will be some alternative arrangements such as we discussed under Clause 1 which will make an amendment of this kind—or the intention of the amendment—unnecessary? If not, I do not see how the Minister can fulfil the undertaking not just to refrain from criminalising the people whom we are considering but also to ensure that stamps are not put in their passports. How else can that be ensured if the Minister is not successful in coming up with an alternative solution under Clause 1?
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Avebury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c114GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:37:46 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290327
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290327
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_290327