I am not in favour of singling out public authorities for special treatment. This would also apply to private bodies such as schools and to the Historic Houses Association, which represents the owners of historic houses that are open to the public. I do not have one, so it does not concern me. However, the general point is valid. The private purse is no more unlimited than the public purse. If anything, the public purse can often levy higher taxes to make up the shortfall. A private organisation cannot do that, it just goes bankrupt. I do not see why this provision should be limited to public authorities. It should apply to all. Everyone has to make a financial judgment on what is possible in all circumstances, so this is a good general point to make for anyone running something that is open to the public.
Compensation Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Erroll
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 December 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c275GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:59:53 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288749
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288749
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288749