The noble Baroness is getting impatient. Meanwhile, back to the Bill, she must in future amend her assertions that this is only a clarificatory measure. It means—the noble Earl has planted this in my mind—that the House of Lords could not go back to the issues covered by Clause 1. Clause 1 is declaratory of the common law as it stands. The House of Lords can change from decade to decade but in future it will not be able to go backwards, so to speak, in terms of the matters covered by Clause 1. That will no longer be within its gift, so the provision is not purely clarificatory—it is fixative.
Compensation Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Phillips of Sudbury
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 December 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Compensation Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c263-4GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:37:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288726
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288726
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_288726