The secondary legislation may be delayed for up to 12 months, although it does not have to be delayed for that period. I am grateful for the Paymaster General’s clarification that it may be delayed for up to 12 months.
The Bill also allows statutory instruments to come into effect 12 months before they are laid. I know that that issue was raised in Standing Committee by my hon. Friends, so I am grateful for the Paymaster General’s reassurance, first, that such statutory instruments will be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure and, secondly, that she will work to ensure that all the regulations relating to the closure of schemes both for PAYE and national insurance will be published at the same time. I am sure that those who take an interest in such matters will welcome that assurance, because it will make scrutiny far easier.
Retrospection has concerned us during many debates on the Bill. There is a concern that it may become widespread and institutionalised, and its use raises several issues. We must ensure that such measures do not become institutionalised, so that the quality, credibility and predictability of our tax system is not undermined.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Hoban
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 December 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
440 c1531-2 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 14:03:53 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287300
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287300
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_287300