As someone who is undoubtedly interested in greater autonomy for Scotland, when I saw an SI with ““Devolution, Scotland””, written on it, I was excited. However, I can assure noble Lords that the disappointment is overwhelming, because the order is not about devolution at all. In fact, it is virtually the first supposedly devolution order that I cannot say I support because it is devolutionary in trend. It is not; it is a disappointing order, albeit pleasantly brief.
The one legislative aspect that I should like to ask about is why the measure was not simply included in the Act or in the Bill. Why was this amendment to the Schedule to the Scotland Act not covered in the Bill itself? Why are we having to go through this process, given that it is not actually taking us anywhere?
Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2006
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Mar and Kellie
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2006.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1201 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 13:42:23 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286192
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286192
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286192