moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 28, Amendment No. 29:
Line 2, leave out ““rectification”” and insert ““registration””
The noble Baroness said: My Lords, although 10 years may seem a long time for the mistakes to be rectified, it is a short time, as we know from the sort of time scale needed for finding out the exact mistakes, tracing them back and getting to the point of rectifying them. We accept that it may be some use to have some form of time limit, and our amendment seeks to say that the registration of those mistakes must have happened by 2015, and that the rectification could occur thereafter. It is a fairly straightforward amendment that simply seeks to recognise that the time needed for such work to be undertaken satisfactorily—and often voluntarily, as the noble Baroness said—should be as generous as possible while still allowing a cut-off date in the end, so that it does not drag on in perpetuity. I beg to move.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c61-2 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:45:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280915
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280915
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280915