moved Amendment No. 2:"Page 3, line 13, at end insert—"
““( ) A right of common cannot at any time after the commencement of this section be created over land to which this Part applies by virtue of prescription.””
The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who are helping me with the job of being the Whip today.
In moving government Amendment No. 2, I shall speak also to government Amendment No. 3. They put beyond doubt the intended effect of Clause 6(1)—that a right of common can no longer be acquired by prescription. Clause 6 provides that, in future, a right of common is to be created over land only by means of an express grant or pursuant to an enactment. There are some grounds to believe that a claim to have acquired a right of common by prescription may nevertheless be successful. That is because such a claim would be made under the Prescription Act 1832, and hence ““pursuant to an enactment””.
The amendments therefore explicitly provide that a right of common cannot come into being by prescription. For the avoidance of any doubt, I should add that the prohibition on prescription includes, in addition to the Prescription Act, prescription under the common law and by lost modern grant. I beg to move.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c15-6 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:55:24 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280847
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280847
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280847