Were it not for the fact that I hope to be the dinner bell of this Committee, we could go on arguing about this amendment for a considerable time. The noble Lord, Lord Prys-Davies is right to draw a comparison between Clause 3(1), where a review occurs on its own—and where we seek to insert ““and monitor””—and Clause 5(1), where the commissioner may indeed review and monitor. So once again we are pleading for some consistency in the Bill.
But we must be grateful for the morsels of comfort from the Minister’s assurance that ““review”” in this context includes ““and monitor””. I am quite prepared to accept his word, but we certainly expect the monitoring process to be included in any review under Clause 3(1). We shall continue to study the Bill and if we feel inclined to return to this matter at a later stage, we will. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Roberts of Conwy
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c229-30GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:36:18 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280645
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280645
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280645