As someone who had a lot to do with the Welsh Language Act 1993—that seems a very long time ago—I feel that I must say a word about this amendment. What the amendment specifically requires is that regulations should refer to the matter of the desirability of the commissioner being a Welsh speaker. It is not a matter for us to insist on but a matter for the Assembly to decide. The amendment, quite properly, expresses that it is desirable for the commissioner to speak Welsh, and I agree very much with that; but there is a considerable difference in practice between expressing a desirability of that kind and expressing a necessity. I do not believe that a lack of the particular skill in the Welsh language should necessarily debar a person from holding that office. After all, if he has sufficient linguistic ability, he could learn Welsh—as so many have done in recent years, even in office; and, of course, he can always employ persons who are Welsh speakers. So I believe that the amendment is right in that it emphasises desirability as opposed to necessity and leaves the matter to the discretion of the Assembly.
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Roberts of Conwy
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c193-4GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:52:45 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280565
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280565
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280565