UK Parliament / Open data

Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for his response. In no way was I trying to sabotage Amendment No. 100, which refers specifically to,"““Working jointly with the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales””," which is highly desirable. Amendment No. 6, which we clarify in Amendment No. 106, is concerned about the Public Services Ombudsman and the Children’s Commissioner for Wales, which are both Welsh posts. The noble Lord, Lord Roberts of Conwy, has highlighted the points that I wish to make, for example, about the UK equality commissioner. I know that a campaign has been running for the creation of a Welsh equality commissioner, as well as for a Scottish one. If that happened, the situation might be much clearer. Also, there is the question of human rights, particularly those of elderly people, which are sometimes infringed without their agreement. Such matters can be poignant and important to the older people concerned. I agree with the other points made by the Minister regarding Amendment No. 10, particularly regarding flexibility. It is clear that the commissioner will be able to do his job much more effectively as a result of that amendment. The amendments tabled by both us and the Minister improve the Bill. I remain not entirely convinced by the arguments put, particularly on equality and human rights, but at this stage I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

674 c192-3GC 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top